This NOTAM will discuss how we
deal with the Super Hornet fighter using
our Flankers and Russian weapons complexes. If
good friends at Omega
Services PMC [1] hire
Grisha to advise
military planners in Asian
countries, who are buying air superiority fighters, this is the kind of
advice Grisha provides.
You need to know how
good Super Hornet flies? We studied this subject for a long time and
used
analysis
in design of Sukhoi and MiG. Good for stock values and revenues!
Asian countries advise
of being
tired of loss-of-face from domination of air by Australia’s
Hornet and F-111. New aircraft come onto Asian region and old Hornets
and
F-111 retire, so balance of power in air combat can change. American
dollar is falling like broken lift, but even so Russian aircraft remain
still
much
cheaper. Asian clients ask me - can Russian aircraft do the job over
Super
Hornet and F-35 JSF? Is acceptable by them to post APA NOTAM – Asian
clients say
give back face.
Two seat combat aircraft
better – make space for some more Omega advisors to help fight. So,
I offer basis of analysis by using Su-30MKI/MKM, Su-30MKK/MK2 or
Su-35BM. Add Flanker upgrades as
they come – Sukhoi factory very quick at upgrades.
Grisha says «you can make
a
big
fighter into attack aircraft, but find very hard to make medium
attack aircraft into good fighter».
Need to depend on better radio-location system [Editor: RLS - Russian
jargon for airborne radar]
and weapons, but if get caught, maybe get run down and killed by enemy
fighter. Much
depend on fuel, range and payload. Long distances around Asia, so
my advice to fit centerline conformal tank on Sukhoi – holds 6,000 kg
fuel and reduces radio-location reflections [Editor: radar
signature] – still plenty of space for weapons
on wing and body. Also fly where Sukhoi own sky – above 15,000
metres [Editor:
45 kft]. Have
radio-electronic combat systems Khibiny-M
[Editor: KNIRTI L175M defensive Electronic Support Measures receiver], Sorbtsiya [Editor:
KNIRTI L−005 wingtip phased array jamming pods] and Lobushka
[Editor: towed decoy]
fitted to Sukhoi fighter.
To make analysis clear,
break
air combat in parts, from the time aircraft take off from Australia
through to the end of combat in «battle space».
Start when aircraft
assemble
and take off. Difficult to hide many aircraft on combat mission.
Sometimes have spies on ground with mobile phone [2].
Use MacDonald's
code for types – Big-Mak, Quarter-Pounder, Super Fries, Small
Fries – you get idea. Phone order to cut-out telephone number, or
«Internet Cafe», then
onto Network Centre in far away country so know Mak order coming. Have
sea-ships in key points to read signals – Russia been
doing this for long time. Have new electronic reconnaissance complexes
[Editor: ESM and direction finding receivers] and infrared
sensors on ships. Find track and pass to Network Centre. Plenty
time to load best weapons and fuel for «counter-air» mission.
Next phase in
combat is first radio-location system
contact. If radio-location signal from Big-Mak [Editor: Wedgetail
AEW&C MESA radar emissions], Sukhoi go around Super-Fries, take
big prize. Have Mak and Super-Fries killers in same bunch. Use K-100
[Editor: Novator R-172/KS-172/AAM-L] or R-37 [Editor: Vympel AA-13
Arrow] for 300 km to 400 km engagement, X-31A and P [Editor: Kh-31A/P /
AS-17 Krypton] for close work.
Look
for Quarter-Pounder [Editor: A330-200MRTT aerial refuelling tanker] on
radio-location system – N011M [Editor: Tikhomirov NIIP N011M BARS
phased array radar on Su-30MK] can see a long way at this
height as radio-location system horizon almost 500 km. Tankers only
have 600 km/hr speed, while
Sukhoi have top speed to 2,500 km per hour, so can run down and kill
tanker quickly. Big centerline fuel tank help the Sukhoi fighter here.
Might have only Super-Fries
[Editor: tanker escort CAP] – has good radio-location system so see
Sukhoi first – but Khibiny radar warner-receiver
know [Editor: ESM receiver] Super-Fries coming. Cannot change physics
laws. Give
Super-Fries time to bug-out but not make mission success.
Soon close to
time Sukhoi
see
Super-Fries with radio-location system. Minister Nelson say Super Fries
stealthy, Russian Institute of Radio
Physics and Electronics says not so, when Super-Fries carry weapons and tanks on
pylons, see about 200 km with N011M radio-location system, much better
with new Irbis-E radio-location system [3].
This
is far away from AIM-120 range of about 80 km, so have lots of time
for free shots at Super-Fries. Shoot pairs of R-77M with mixed
self-guidance heads [Editor: GSN - Russian jargon for missile seeker] –
active radio-location missile go first, if scare him pretty good so he
turn
to beam, expose his pants to R-77M Infra-Red or Optical missiles [4].
Super-Fries
ALE-55
radio-electronic combat complex [Editor: Russian jargon for towed decoy] good against
radio-location guidance missile, not so good on Infra-Red or Optic. Can
dance around
outside Super-Fries' missile range and use Sukhoi radio network
[Editor:
TKS-2 intraflight digital radio datalink / network] to make sure no
Sukhois in range of Super-Fries' missile. Omega advisor in back of Sukhoi help here as fighter
controller.
Stay until Super-Fries reach Bingo [Editor: only fuel remaining to get
home] and run for
home – cannot
escape at Mach 1.6 when Sukhoi make 2.35 – take R-77 or R-27 in pants.
Next is guts
fight –
close inside AIM-120 range. Still some tricks to use. Sukhoi OLS-30
[Editor: Infra-Red Search and Track set] sees flare of Super-Fries' missile launch at long range – gives
time to turn
away and wait until Super-Fries' missile fall into sea. Then turn back to close
again. Have lots of fuel and many weapons, so can play «cat and mouse»
for some turns. Grisha likes upgrade to OLS-35, which looks all round
Sukhoi aircraft all the time.
Maybe Grisha
makes
mistake and misses Super-Fries, and radio-electronic combat complex warning alarm start as Super-Fries' missile self-guidance head radio-location system switches on
to transmit [Editor: AIM-120 seeker going active]. Break turn and
use Khibiny, Sorbtsiya and Lobushka radio electronic combat complex
[Editor: EW self protection suite]. Lots of G for
minute or so. Not many missiles good at high G above 15,000 metres.
Also fire nose first, then turn and guide missile with tail
radio-location system. Not
touch Grisha this way. Tail radio-location system watch to see no
surprises [5].

If Super-Fries go
home and not die this time, then Grisha get Super-Fries next time.
Get closer for «knife
fight»
if missiles and radio-location system jammed by Super-Fries' radio electronic combat
complex. Switch
on own radio
electronic combat complex to spoil radio-location system
missiles. Can fly higher and turn much faster than Super-Fries so he
have job getting it up.
Sukhoi have had
helmet sight long time for R-73
shots, since 1980s. Even fire R-73 backwards on some Sukhois [6]. Here can turn
quicker and get first shot, then move out of fight. Like guns very
much – video from gunsight alway good discussion in officer mess!
So, Grisha
thinks the Sukhois have
a good
chance against Super-Fries but not other way round. Need to think
tactics and fighter positions in combat situation. Sukhoi can fly
higher,
faster, longer, turn much better and have good radio-location system
and radio electronic combat complex, plus Infra-Red sensors. Stay in
area of superiority above
Super-Fries and win almost all times.
Minister Nelson
say
Super-Fries decision «no-brainer». Seems right –
he makes big joke!
|
Col. Grisha
Medved
is a former retired fighter pilot.
Endnotes and Comments:
[1]
Omega
Services PMC is a Russian contractor specialising in the provision of
experienced military personnel and consultancy, occupying a similar
market niche to Blackwater and other US contractors. With access to a
very large pool of highly experienced former Soviet and Russian
military professionals, Omega provide highly capable consultancy
services. URI: http://omega.warfare.ru/content/view/13/40/lang,en/
[2] Col Medved is describing a technique used
very effectively by Australia against the Japanese during WW2, and more
recently against the Argentinians by the British in 1982. Ground
observers use covert channels to report on aircraft departures and
geography permitting, outbound headings.
[3] The Irbis E is a block upgrade to the N-011M
BARS on the Su-30MKI/MKM, or a retrofit option for the
Su-27SKM/Su-30MKK/MK2. It is the baseline radar configuration for the
Su-35BM.
[4] This is a standard evasive tactic when under
attack by a radar guided missile. The aim is to cause a rapid change in
Doppler which may cause a seeker lock to break, while also
maximising the angle rate and G-load the inbound missile must sustain
to track the target. NB Russian and previously Soviet policy was
and remains to retrofit alternate seekers to
long range / BVR missiles. The seekers used in the
R-73 family of short range air combat missiles have been retrofitted to
the R-27 / AA-10 Alamo and R-77 / AA-12 Adder BVR missiles. The
'Optical
seeker' referred to here is the third generation imaging seeker in
development for the R-74 series, similar to the ASRAAM, Python 5 and
AIM-9X seeker. The play is to force the target fighter to turn and
expose its hot end to the inbound heatseeking missile. If the fighter
has to use afterburner to sustain the turn, then its heat signature is
further increased aiding the second inbound missile in detection and
tracking.
[5] A tail warning radar is an option for a
number of Flanker variants, mounted in the centrebody tail bullet.
Phazotron and Tikhomirov NIIP have offered several phased arrays for
this application, including derivatives of inlet nose bullet radars
designed for block upgrades of the MiG-21 / J-7 Fishbed fighters. While
these radars lack the range of the nose mounted BARS and Irbis-E, they
are significantly more powerful and longer ranging than active radar
Missile Approach Warning Systems (MAWS) available for Western fighters,
and double up as midcourse datalink transmitters for missile guidance.
This allows the Flanker to take a BVR missile shot, perform a maxium G
U-turn, and continue to provide midcourse guidance updates to the
missile as it retreats from the missile engagement envelope of the
target fighter. Target coordinates, where the tail warning radar lacks
the required performance to maintain a track, would be relayed
via TKS-2 datalink from another Flanker to cue the radar boresight.
Readers should note that missile kinematic No Escape
Zones (NEZ) are strongly asymmetric in relation to the direction the
target is flying in - in a closing geometry with the missile and target
heading toward each other, the NEZ footprint is large since the
relative velocity is the sum of the missile and target velocities.
Conversely, the kinematic NEZ footprint shrinks dramatically in a
tailchase geometry, as the relative velocity is the difference in the
velocities of the missile and target. In a scenario where the fighters
initiate the engagement head to head at maximum missile kinematic
range, if one of the fighters can turn away immediately after its
opponent launches, the changed engagement geometry shrinks the missile
NEZ. If the retreating fighter has a tail mounted radar, it can
continue to guide its missile against the advancing fighter, but the
latter can no longer hit the retreating fighter and must deal with an
inbound missile.

[6] The Vympel R-73R variant has a booster pack
attached and is designed to be carried tail first on a launch rail, and
fired backward.
|