|
| Last
Updated: Tue Jul 22 11:44:47 UTC 2008
|
|
8th
May, 2005
|
The Editor
Air Power Australia
http://www.ausairpower.net/
Dear Sir,
I write with concern regarding the apparent lack of integrity by our
present government and defence leaders in maintaining their choice of
the JSF as our primary military combat aircraft for the next 40 years.
The JSFs are not the right choice for Australia.
Our government is incorrectly choosing to uphold their decision to
acquire JSF strike fighters to replace our F-111s and F/A-18s.
Our government and defence leaders appear to be saving face by
maintaining this incorrect choice, despite changed circumstances since
2002.
F-111s with F/A-22 Raptors are the right choice for Australia.
Australia's is the only country that still deploys F-111s in it's air
force and we should keep them and improve them.
There is no other aircraft currently available that can effectively
provide for Australia's current and near future defence needs better
than the F-111 in its long distance strike, reconnaissance and deterrent
roles.
There are currently plenty of surplus F-111s mothballed in the USA, we
should acquire these before they are scrapped.
The Defence department is planning to scrap the F-111s by 2010 and is
already prematurely eroding our F-111 fleet by withholding approval of
funds for new and continuing F-111 projects.
We should acquire a fleet of F/A-22 Raptors - not JSFs - to replace our
F/A-18s.
Other major and developing nations in our region of the world have
acquired Russian Sukhoi fighters which will eat JSFs and F/A-18s for
breakfast.
F/A-22 Raptors will dominate Russian Sukhois and will enable Australia
to maintain its traditional role as a primary peace enforcer in our
region. F-111s can out-run and out-distance Russian Sukhoi's and F-111s
could be made more stealthy.
F/A-22 Raptors are complementary to F-111s, the better F/A-22 engines
fit directly into F-111s and enable them to cruise economically at
supersonic speeds.
JSFs have serious limitations, they cannot provide us with air
dominance, have only one engine and only one pilot for long distance
flights. They cannot supercruise, have limited speed, have limited range
and have limited stealth.
The JSF choice declares Australia's apathy towards sharing the
responsibility of keeping the peace in our region of the world.
The JSF is designed for supporting ground troops and it's choice
suggests that Australia is intending aggression and is only interested
in preparing itself to support future US coalition operations in distant
parts of the world.
The loss of the F-111 in Australia will also result in the loss of the
'critical mass' that currently enables our very healthy home grown and
highly innovative Australian military and domestic aerospace industry.
To do their job, we must provide our air force personnel with the very
best practical and most effective technology, that only the F/A-22s and
our F-111s will give.
Graeme Palmer
Springwood, Queensland
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Artwork, graphic design, layout and text © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Carlo Kopp; Text © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Peter Goon; All
rights reserved. |
|
Recommended browsers
Mozilla/Firefox, Konqueror. |
|
$Revision: 1.356 $
|
| NLA Pandora Archive |
| Notices |
| |