SAM
System
Mobility
Russian
and PLA Air Defence System
Vehicles
Technical Report APA-TR-2008-0601
|
by
Dr
Carlo
Kopp, AFAIAA,
SMIEEE,
PEng
June, 2008
Updated July, 2010
Updated May, 2011
Updated April, 2012
Text
©
2008
-
2012
Carlo
Kopp

|
|
Introduction
The subject of Air Defence System Vehicles, examples being
Transporter Erector Launcher
and Radar (TELAR), Transporter
Erector Launcher (TEL) and TransLoader (TL) vehicles, or radar
vehicles, receives far less
attention in contemporary Western defence analysis than it merits. This
is particularly unfortunate given the rapid growth in the mobility of
Russian and PLA IADS elements over the last decade, and the
introduction of a new generation of wheeled and hardened vehicles. We
are observing a deep transformation in the manner of IADS deployment
with commensurate improvements in IADS survivability.
Perhaps the most famous quote by Generaloberst Heinz
Wilhelm ‘Schnelle Heinz’ Guderian is: “Der Motor des Panzers ist ebenso seine
Waffe wie die Kanone” i.e. “The
engine
of
a
tank
is
as
much
a
weapon
as
the cannon”. The
corollary of Guderian's saying is simply that “the mobility of a SAM, SPAAG or SPAAGM
system is
as important as the lethality of its missile or gun system”.
Mobility matters for two reasons, the first being battlespace mobility or the ability of the
system to “hide, shoot and scoot” evading defence suppression
weapons, and
the second being the system's deployability
or ability to redeploy locally, across a theatre, or between theatres.
Unlike Integrated Air Defence Systems (IADS) of the past which relied
heavily on fixed communications landlines, or fixed microwave repeater
links, modern systems are linked by radiofrequency, typically microwave
or VHF/UHF, datalinks or indeed networks. The principal determinant of
the system's mobility and deployability is then the design of the
vehicles carrying the system.
Broadly air defence weapons can be divided into fixed, semi-mobile, and
mobile systems.
Fixed systems are typically installed on concrete pads or other
hardened or semihardened structures. This strategy of air defence
weapon deployment is largely extinct due to the lethality of
anti-radiation missiles and other weapons deployed by SEAD/DEAD tasked
combat aircraft.
Semi-mobile systems are typically moved by road, with launchers and
other components carried by trailers, or built as trailers. Such
systems will take between 30 minutes and several hours to deploy or
stow, and are characteristic of 1960s technology Soviet PVO weapons.
Like fixed systems, their survivability has proven to be poor, as
evidenced by losses in Vietnam, the Middle East, Operation Desert Storm
and Operation Allied Force. Nevertheless, the large number of legacy
Soviet systems in use indicates that such weapons will still be
encountered.
Fully mobile systems may be road mobile, or off-road mobile, the former
using wheeled vehicles, the latter wheeled or tracked vehicles. In
general tracked vehicles have better survivability than wheeled
vehicles against the full range of air delivered weapons, and land
force weapons.
In general tracked vehicles provide by far the best off road mobility,
due to the low surface loading of tracks, the ability to perform pivot
turns, and the ability to scale obstacles and cross ditches. The
drawbacks of tracked vehicles are often considerably higher operating
costs, longer time to repair a broken track compared to a punctured
wheel, and usually lower roadspeed. Often tracked vehicles will be
heavier than their wheeled counterparts, limiting options in airlift.
Where off road mobility is not regarded to be critical, military trucks
and tow tractors in the 10 to 20 tonne class have been used most
frequently for this purpose, often towing the air defence weapon in a
semitrailer or trailer arrangement.
The compromise between tracked and standard truck based systems are
specialised high off road mobility vehicles purposed designed for the
carriage of missiles. The 8 x 8 and 6 x 6 vehicles produced by MAZ/MZKT
over the last five decades, and the contemporary BZKT built
replacements, represent the best examples.
The MAZ-543 family of 8 x 8 heavy trucks has been used to carry
ballistic missiles, ground launched strategic cruise missiles, antiship
cruise missiles, air defence gun systems, air defence missile systems,
as well as the Soviet High Energy Laser Directed Energy Weapon system.
It has also been used to carry or tow a number of different radar
systems, and associated mast systems.
These Technical Reports are intended to provide a basic reference
covering the
most
widely used vehicles in this application.
|
Quantifying
the
Air
Defence System Mobility Problem
Highly mobile SAM systems and supporting
assets, such as radars, operated to a disciplined “hide,
shoot and scoot”
doctrine by well trained and proficient crews will present genuine
challenges in SEAD and DEAD operations.
In a well designed “hide, shoot and scoot” scheme, missile batteries are
dispersed and usually camouflaged, and follow a highly disciplined
EMCON protocol. The battery engagement radar will only emit if a target
enters its engagement envelope, and emissions will be constrained to
the target alone, the intent being to minimise opportunities for
detection by enemy ISR assets or SEAD/DEAD tasked aircraft. In this
regime of operation, the engagement radar for the missile battery is
cued by other assets to point at the target, missile TELs are put on
standby ready to shoot by datalink commands, upon which the radar
initiates search and track to prosecute the missile engagement. Time of
flight for a modern hypersonic or fast supersonic SAM might be between
tens of seconds or a small number of minutes, the latter for a very
long range shot on a climb-cruise-dive or ballistic SAM trajectory.
Whether the missiles hit or miss the target, the battery has disclosed
its location by emitting, so once the missile engagement has finished,
the battery must “scoot”
to a new hide to prepare and then wait for the next engagement.
The time to stow all components of the battery and initiate a move
varies, but in modern Russian systems the cited stow time, during which
hydraulic actuators fold and stow the antennas, lower the TEL launch
gantries, and retract the outriggers, is typically 5 minutes or less.
Modern acquisition radars, especially longer ranging types, may take
longer due to more complex stow operations with folding antenna
systems, and some retrofitted SAM TELs may also take longer.
Once the battery components are stowed, the convoy departs the location
as quickly as possible, to relocate.
Transit speeds between locations depend on the local terrain and road
environment, and the type of vehicles employed by the battery.
Where terrain is heavily forested, and unsealed dirt tracks or open
flat ground is used to transit, transit speeds may be low, as vehicles
are mostly limited in movements to specific paths and vehicle speed
itself may not exceed 30 to 50 km/h due to road condition.
In developed areas where sealed roads with good load bearing capability
are near to the battery hides, transit speeds will be limited by the
vehicles employed, and any other road traffic which be occupying the
carriageway. Under these conditions, wheeled vehicles may sustain their
full dash speed, which may be up to 80 km/h (~50 MPH).
With every minute elapsed from the point in time where the battery has
initiated its move, the worst case area to be searched to find and
attack the battery increases with the square of vehicle speed and
elapsed time:
Where A is the search area, tstart
is the time when the battery initiated its move, tstop
is the time at which the search is performed, and v(t)transit
is the time function of the radial component of the vehicle's transit
velocity. The
worst case is where the missile battery can choose an arbitrary
direction
to egress in, and do so along a linear radial path from the initial
site.
This problem is analogous to that of searching for a submerged
submarine following a broken initial contact - as time elapses, the
area expands with the square of target velocity and time.
While in practice local geography, especially in complex terrain, and
road availability will constrain the actual available paths the missile
battery can use, the expression describing the worst case scenario
illustrates the problem confronted by the SEAD/DEAD force. Fast transit
speeds and suitable terrain could see large areas within which the
missile battery may be hiding.
The following plots depict the worst case scenario where optimal
transit conditions exist, for battery stow times of 45, 15 and 5
minutes, and vehicle transit speeds between 30 km/h and 80 km/h. A
battery carried by vehicles capable of sustaining 70 - 80 km/h
roadspeed could be anywhere within an area of 3,500 - 5,000 square
nautical miles given a 5 minute battery stow time.



The widely held belief that battery mobility
is not a major impediment to SEAD/DEAD operations is not supportable by
any material evidence.
Table 1 illustrates transit speed performance for a range of Russian
vehicle types employed to carry air defence systems.
Vehicle
Type
|
Max
Road
Speed
[km/h]
|
Cruise
Road
Speed
[km/h]
|
Systems
|
Notes
|
BAZ-6402
|
70.0
|
-
|
SA-21
SA-20B Gargoyle
64N6 Gamma SE
|
|
BAZ-6909
|
80.0
|
-
|
SA-21
SA-20B Gargoyle
SA-22 Greyhound
55Zh6M Nebo M
|
|
BAZ-69096
|
50.0
|
-
|
SA-23 / S-300VMK
|
|
MAZ-543/7910
|
60.0
|
45.0
|
SA-10B Grumble
SA-20A Gargoyle
SA-20B Gargoyle
|
|
MAZ-537
|
55.0
|
-
|
40V6M/MD Masts
|
SA-10, 20, 21
|
KrAZ-260
|
80.0
|
-
|
SA-10B Grumble
SA-20A Gargoyle
SA-20B Gargoyle |
|
Ural-375
|
75.0
|
-
|
9T33 Transporter
P-15M Squat Eye
P-15/19 Flat Face
1L119 Nebo SVU
|
|
MZKT-6922
|
80.0
|
-
|
SA-15 Gauntlet
SA-17 Grizzly
SA-8 Gecko (Osa-T)
T38 Stilet
|
|
MZKT-8022
|
60.0
|
-
|
SA-3 Goa Upgrade
|
|
KAMAZ
6560
|
70.0
|
-
|
SA-22 Greyhound |
|
MT-T
|
65.0
|
-
|
SA-12B Giant
SA-12A Gladiator
SA-23 |
|
GM5955
|
65.0
|
-
|
SA-15 Gauntlet
SA-19 Grison
|
|
GM352M1E
|
65.0
|
-
|
SA-22 Greyhound |
|
BAZ-5937
|
80.0
|
-
|
SA-8 Gecko |
|
While many Cold War era systems were limited
in sustained transit speeds to 45.0 km/h, more recent wheeled designs
are mostly built for much faster sustained road speeds.
The systematic design of all Russian built
IADS components for a “hide, shoot and scoot” regime of operations is
resulting in pervasive changes to the character of future IADS,
producing significant long term pressure to engage a SAM battery on
initial contact. This in turn requires SEAD/DEAD aircraft with the
survivability to loiter in contested airspace, or ISR assets with equal
survivability. Platforms with lower survivability will suffer
unsustainable loss rates in battle with high mobility modern IADS.
|
Russian
and PLA Air Defence System
Mobility Summary
Mobility
Category: |
Highly
Mobile
|
Mobile
|
Semi-Mobile
|
Static
|
Stow/Deploy Time:
|
2-10
min
|
10-60
min
|
60-120
min
|
120+ min
|
|
9S32
Grill
Pan deployed on MT-T series tracked vehicle
(NIEMI image).
|
Russian
and PLA Air Defence System
Vehicle Technical Reports
|
Technical
Report
APA-TR-2008-0601-A S-300P [SA-10/20]/S-400
[SA-21] Air
Defence System Vehicles
|
|
Technical Report
APA-TR-2008-0601-B S-300V [SA-12]/S-300VM [SA-23] Air
Defence
System Vehicles |
|
Technical Report APA-TR-2008-0601-C
Legacy Strategic and
Area Defence System Vehicles |
|
Technical Report
APA-TR-2008-0601-D Russian and PLA Point
Defence and C-PGM System Vehicles
|
|
S-400
Triumf
/
SA-21
battery
92N6
Grave
Stone and 96L6 radars deployed on high mobility MZKT-7930
vehicles, evolved from the MAZ-543 Uragan Scud TEL chassis. The LEMZ
96L6E is common to the late
production S-300PMU2 Favorit / SA-20B Gargoyle exported to the PRC
(©
2010, Yevgeniy
Yerokhin, Missiles.ru).
9K317E
Buk
M2E
/
MZKT-6922
/
SA-17
Grizzly
battery
component
models
at
Zhuhai 2010 (© 2010 Air
Power Australia via Zhenguan Studio).
Kupol 9K332 Tor M2E / SA-15 Gauntlet point defence and
Counter-PGM system at MAKS 2007. This new variant is hosted on the new
MZKT-6922 6 x 6 TLAR/TELAR chassis, common the new 9K317 Buk M2/M2E /
SA-17 Grizzly (NIEMI image).
Fully
deployed
72V6
SPAAGM
prototype
on
BAZ-6909
chassis.
This
variant
incorporates a new VNIIRT designed 1RS2-1E agile
beam
phased array engagement radar. The primary design aim for
this system was the interception of PGMs, especially the AGM-88 HARM
and GBUs (Sergei Kuznetsov
via Strizhi.ru).
|
|
References
|
- С-125
(SA-3, Goa), зенитная ракетная система, ОРУЖИЕ
РОССИИ, Федеральный электронный справочник вооружения и военной
техники / Вооружение и военная техника ПВО, URL: http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051051056124052048051048.html
- Зенитный
ракетный комплекс С-125 «Печора-2А», ГСКБ
"Алмаз-Антей", URL: http://www.raspletin.ru/produce/adms/s125pechora2a/
- «Оса»,
(9К33,
SA-8,
SA-8A,
Gecko)
зенитный
ракетный
комплекс
- The OSA
anti-aircraft missile system, JSC "Izhevsk Electromechanical Plant
"Kupol".
- The
TOR-M1 anti-aircraft missile system, JSC "Izhevsk Electromechanical
Plant "Kupol".
- The
TOR-M2E anti-aircraft missile system, JSC "Izhevsk
Electromechanical Plant "Kupol".
- Miroslav
Gyürösi, Russian companies team to develop wheeled
Tor-M2E , Jane's Missiles &
Rockets, October 01, 2007.
- Pantsir-S1
Air Defense Missile/Gun System, KBP Instrument Design
Bureau, 59
Shcheglovskaya Zaseka St., 300001 Tula, Russia.
- Tunguska-M1
Air Defense Missile/Gun System, KBP Instrument Design
Bureau, 59
Shcheglovskaya Zaseka St., 300001 Tula, Russia.
- 30
mm 2A38M Automatic Anti-Aircraft Gun, KBP Instrument Design
Bureau, 59
Shcheglovskaya Zaseka St., 300001 Tula, Russia.
- Phazotron
Shlem air defence radar system, Phazotron NIIR.
- Martin
Rosenkranz, MAKS 2007
Spezial: Pantsir-S1 (SA-22), Russlands neuestes Flugabwehrsystem.
- PGZ95
Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Artillery, Chinese Defence Today.
- HQ-7
(FM-80)
Surface-to-Air
Missile
System, Chinese Defence Today.
- HQ-61A
Surface-to-Air
Missile, Chinese Defence Today.
- Schamiloglu E,
High
Power Electromagnetic Threats to the
Civilian Infrastructure - A New Concern for a New Age, IFIS
Briefing, November, 2004, URL: http://www.ece.unm.edu/ifis/papers/CyberSecurity.ppt
.
- Air
Power
Australia - May
2008 -
High
Energy Laser Directed Energy Weapons
- ГСКБ
"Алмаз-Антей", Лазерные
технологии, 125190, Российская Федерация, г.
Москва, Ленинградский
проспект, д. 80, корпус 16.
- Kopp
C., Australian
Aviation
-
October
1995
- 76N6 Clam Shell Acquisition
Radar Revealed (S-300PMU/SA-10)
- Kopp C., Australian
Aviation - October 2003 -Asia's
New SAMs Pt.1 (S-300PMU/SA-10)
- Kopp C., Australian
Aviation - November 2003 -Asia's
New SAMs Pt.2 (S-400/SA-20,
S-300V/SA-12)
- The International Assessment and
Strategy Center -
February 25th, 2006 - Almaz
S-300
–
China's
“Offensive”
Air
Defense
- RusArmy.com
- Видео ПВО России
[Video
of
Russian
PVO]
S-300PMU
footage
(Highly
Recommended)
- OAO Koncern PVO
Almaz-Antey [Manufacturer's
site in Russian] ГСКБ "Алмаз-Антей", 125190,
Российская
Федерация,
г.
Москва,
Ленинградский
проспект,
д.
80,
корпус
16.
- S-200
/ SA-5 Gammon - http://www.s-200.de/
- ЗЕНИТНАЯ
РАКЕТНАЯ СИСТЕМА С-200 - http://pvo.guns.ru/s200/index.htm
- Modernizacje
zestawu przeciwlotniczego S-125 "Newa" - http://darek64.neostrada.pl/newa.htm
- JSC
Defence Systems - http://www.defensys.ru/proizvodstvo21_eng.html
- Мытищинский
машиностроительный завод (Metrovagonmash),
Тунгуска-М1 на шасси ГМ-5975 - http://www.metrowagonmash.ru/gm5975t.htm
- Мытищинский
машиностроительный завод (Metrovagonmash),
Бук-М1-2 на шасси ГM-569 - http://www.metrowagonmash.ru/gm569t.htm
- Мытищинский
машиностроительный завод
(Metrovagonmash), Top-М1 на шасси ГМ-5955 - http://www.metrowagonmash.ru/gm5955t.htm
- Система ПВО
"Фаворит", ГСКБ "Алмаз-Антей", URL: http://www.raspletin.ru/produce/adms/s300pmu2/
|
A
VHF-band high mobility Vostok E demonstrator deployed. The folding,
elevating and telescoping antenna can stow or deploy in less than 10
minutes (KB Radar).
The L-band JY-29/Type 120 (depicted), YLC-18, JYL-1 and YL-11B
are typical of the new generation of PLA self-propelled tactical 3D
acquisition radars, designed to support a range of SAM systems. Mostly
they are carried on licence built Mercedes-Benz chassis, and often
employ complex elevating mast systems (© 2009,
Bradley Huang).
HQ-9
TEL using the Taian TAS-5380 chassis (via Chinese Internet).
Early TAS5380 TEL on
display at Datangshan. The design is modelled on the MAZ-543/7910
series (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010 Air Power Australia).
New
design HQ-7B/FM-90
TELAR
on
parade
in
2009
(via
Chinese
Internet).
Technical Report APA-TR-2008-0601
|